The Futility of Fighting Climate Change

Recently there is a lot of debate and derision around the science of climate change. As an example, a recent article in the Times Online lists numerous studies criticizing the validity of data gathered by weather stations around the world. The point: many of the readings of these stations have been compromised by changes in context. A taste:

Some are next to air- conditioning units or are on waste treatment plants. One of the most infamous shows a weather station next to a waste incinerator…the weather station at Rome airport…catches the hot exhaust fumes emitted by taxiing jets.

For a summary of other recent controversy read “How Wrong is the IPCC?” in Mother Jones. On the other side of the debate, I regularly receive urgent email from Repower America trying to enlist me in the fight against big oil and the fight for clean energy.

Fight, fight, fight, fight, FIGHT! We are at war with…our selves. The enemy is us and we are losing.

Are we affecting the climates that have supported and sustained civilization for the last few thousand years? Absolutely. How bad is it? I don’t know and, really, neither does anyone else. Why? We are dealing with complex, open, living systems influencing and interacting with other equally complex, open, living systems. In these relationships cause becomes effect, effect turns to cause. Nothing is fixed, change is utterly non-linear and notoriously unpredictable. We might as well walk outside and try punching air. It certainly feels good…

We are simply not designed for this struggle. In trying to comprehend climate change our senses fail us. We deal in immediacy. The building of our capacity to sense the long term is a work in progress desperately in need of more funding. Logic unravels. How do we build a useful proof when “A” and “B” are both and neither? Mathematic modeling is hopelessly inadequate. How do we construct a model for life?

So, what should we do? Stick with what we’re good at, agree on what we agree on, sprinkle in a liberal dose of common sense and top it all with a big ‘ol dollop of compassion.

What are we good at? Building stuff. Constructing civilizations. Creating profoundly moving art. Telling stories. Learning and adapting.

What do we agree on? I’m betting that we all want to live somewhere beautiful. We all want stimulating, inspiring work and lives. We all want good neighbors. We all want lives of prosperity and abundance.

What is common sense? Let’s listen to our senses. Let’s keep it simple. How would a house full of auto exhaust look, smell and feel? How would a plastic fish sandwich taste? Anyone for eau de landfill? How about a chocolate pesticide milkshake? Now, how about basking in the sun on a cool day? What is the feel of a cool breeze on a warm summer day? The feel and smell of cool, moist soil? The taste of a clear mountain stream? Listen to your senses, they’ve done a pretty dang good job of keeping us alive so far…

Compassion. C’mon people, like it or not we are in this–suffering and succeeding–together. Just because we disagree does not mean we have to dismiss, disengage and disintegrate. If we are going to fight, let’s stop beating the shit out of each other and find the common passion to design and implement ways of working and living together that create and sustain life, that create and sustain that which sustains us.

Let’s get really good at it.

Just to keep the record straight this is not a feel good appeal for a world of ponies and rainbows. This is hard work, a life’s work. And, yes, the devil is definitely in the details. And, yes, we are going to disagree, lose our tempers, maybe even throw some shoes. But, let’s keep our eyes on the prize. Climate change is not the enemy. It is a symptom and a growing cause of our collective dis-ease.

Let’s use a little more common sense and let’s stick with what we’re good at and let’s generate a lot more compassion. Resistance is futile.

Tags: climate change, common sense, compassion, complex living open systems, data, IPCC, Repower America, weather stations

Consuming Thoughts: Y

Y is for Yes and the Power of Intention. Peter Gabriel: And the tears roll down my swollen cheek, I think I’m losing it, getting weaker…I hold the line, I hold the line. Record numbers of homeowners are walking away from mortgages that they are fully capable of paying. According to a Times Magazine article Their decision is strategic. It’s good business. As the writer says, “we are all economic pinballs, insensibly colliding for better or worse.” Financial services organizations routinely make such “strategic” decisions. Banks no longer own mortgages, why should we?

This is economic nihilism and it does make sense – if we view our lives as one thin transaction after another. If we believe we’re losing it we probably will. Disconnective thinking breeds disconnected action. It is a a symptom of withdrawal, collapse, contraction and fear. Mentally, physically, spiritually we grow weaker. We believe we can separate our “selves” from “the world.”

We hold the line. The line is a thread. A thread that connects and binds us together. We can ignore it. We can say “no” to it but the relationship won’t go away. We hold the line. We can turn our backs on responsibility. We can put our heads in the sand and refuse ownership and obligation. We remain connected, however, the quality of that connection is weakened, degraded, frayed. Or, we can say, “yes.” “Yes”, opens us to opportunity, possibility and abundance.

They hold the line. What would happen if a line of credit was also seen as a line of connection? What would happen if banks looked at us less as risks to be managed and more as opportunities to increase social and relational capital in the communities they serve?

We hold the line. What would happen if we said “yes” to spending strategically to build value in our cities and communities? What if our intention as consumers was to support and sustain the banks, businesses and services that sustain us?

Try it. Say “yes”, reach out and connect. Manifest the intention to support and sustain each other. Share what we share anyway to strengthen our connection. It is within our grasp. We hold the line, the line of strength that pulls us through the fear.

Tags: abundance, credit line, mortgages, Peter Gabriel, strategic defaults, We hold the line

Consuming Thoughts: X

X is for “Exchange” Your Money for Action. George Bailey: …this rabble you’re talking about… they do most of the working and paying and living and dying in this community. We do. 99.9% of businesses operating in the world are small to medium-sized businesses. In the US, small and medium-sized businesses employ over 60 million people. Currently, many of these businesses and their people are suffering. Cut off from sources of credit, capital and equity they are slowly, inexorably going broke.

Traditionally, small, community banks and lenders were there to serve small businesses and individuals. However, according to the Move Your Money post in the Huffington Post:

…America’s Main Street community banks — the vast majority of which avoided the banquet of greed and corruption that created the toxic economic swamp we are still fighting to get ourselves out of — are struggling. Many of them have closed down (or been taken over by the FDIC) over the last 12 months. The government policy of protecting the Too Big and Politically Connected to Fail is badly hurting the small banks, which are having a much harder time competing in the financial marketplace. As a result, a system which was already dangerously concentrated at the top has only become more so.

So, what can we do? Three things:

1. Continue to buy local. Small and medium-sized businesses are overwhelmingly local and regional businesses. Healthy cities and communities are sustained on a resilient web of local commerce and consumption.
2. Start saving and investing locally. Put your money in local, community-focused institutions. The folks at the Huffington Post have started the Move Your Money campaign and website where you can get information about how and where you can make a difference just by opening a bank account. Community banks, savings and loans and credit unions have a much bigger interest and stake in maintaining and growing a healthy community.
3. Check out this video. George Bailey or Mr. Potter? The choice is ours.

Tags: buy local, George Bailey, Its a Wonderful Life, Move Your Money, small and medium-sized business, The Huffington Post, too big to fail

Consuming Thoughts: S

S means Savings Through Which We All Win. John Lydon; Anger is an energy! Anger is an energy! So is money. It is the water cycling through our economic ecosystems, the electric currency powering the prosperity of our communities. Life is a big ‘ol square dance of energy exchange.

Money is kind of funny because it has value only because we agree that it does. It’s not food, shelter, clothing and certainly not sex. It is a means to an end. What end? In the “West” we tend to focus on personal prosperity. In the “East” there is still often a strong element of familial piety that creates large amounts of savings and distribution within large, extended families. Both models work and both can become highly dysfunctional. Their relative levels of success depend on where we stand in terms of scarcity and abundance.

Scarcity leads to contraction, hoarding, and win-lose competition for what are perceived as limited resources. Abundance demands we expand our sense of “me” to “we” and our sense of family to include community. In a scarcity driven world we save money out of fear and distrust. With an abundance mindset we save money because of its potential to benefit us and the community that sustains us. Scarcity leads us to the false choice of “either/or.” Abundance challenges us to be big enough to hold “both/and.”

To spend money we have to save money. Saving is good. It builds up a reservoir of energy. What we need to consider is, “What are we saving it for?” How can those savings be best used to sustain us and that which sustains us?

Another key consideration is value. Some of us are highly skilled at accumulating money but are terrible musicians and would soon whither in the extremes of a 1st grade classroom. Currently schools throughout the US are significantly underfunded yet scarcity minded investment banks like Goldman Sachs have set aside over $20 billion in bonuses. Koyaanisqatsi, koyaanisqatsi.

Collectively we have the talent, resources and means to create communities of abundance. Our biggest obstacle? Our selves. What are we saving it for? What are we waiting for? What can we create-together?

Tags: abundance, bonuses, Goldman Sachs, John Lydon, koyaanisqatsi, savings, scarcity

Consuming Thoughts: H

H is for Health That Should Never Be Poor. Basho: Old pond / frog jumps in / the sound of water. In the US we are currently wrapped up in a very important, often ridiculous debate about healthcare or, more accurately, health insurance. Having just repatriated and wandered the maze of healthcare choices”, as a consumer, I can say the array of choices in front of me was more like a game of Russian roulette or a bizarre amalgam of Sophie’s Choice and Groundhog Day. Each of the myriad “choices” I had to make was a gamble or a sacrifice. It was stressful, unsatisfying and, well, unhealthy.

David Gilmour: I am you and what I see is me. Consider a frog. Essentially frogs need water, warmth and bugs. Taint or take away one of those essentials (or the conditions that support these essentials) and you’ve got a mess of unhealthy, mutated frogs or no frogs at all. Frogs are voracious consumers in their eco-systemic niche. So are we. As humans we need a healthy, resilient, sustaining Value Web, yet so many of the choices we are being asked to make are neither healthy for us, our communities and the eco-systems that sustain us.

For consumers, shopping is a highly entertaining game of choice. The question is what are we really choosing? In the case of healthcare we are “choosing” damaged goods from a broken system. In the case of health, though, as we shop, we have the opportunity to choose for our selves and support the health of our communities and the eco-systems that support them. Our choices can give life instead damaging the conditions that make it possible. We can design the effects of our purchases to be less bad and more good and healthier for all of us-including the frogs.

Tags: Basho, David Gilmour, health, health insurance, healthcare, russian roulette, sustainability, value web

Consuming Thoughts: G

G is for Good, of Which We Need More. Tom Waits: You got to keep the devil way down in the hole. Disposable diapers. The mark of a sophisticated consumer society. No muss, no fuss, take ‘em up and toss ‘em into the nearest available trash receptacle. That amounts to over 4,000,000 tons of turd bombs trucked to landfills yearly in the US alone. Shocking. What’s our response to shock? We recoil, pull back and, physiologically prepare for fight or flight. Fleeing, we fling our filth away, deliberately in denial, we cut our selves off from considering the consequences. Fighting, we campaign in outrage, demand responsibility through reduction, writing rants, we burn off our anger in opposition. We’re demanding rather stridently that we change behavior. For some reason, this rarely yields the results intended…

John Cleese: And now for something completely different. What if we re-thought, re-designed, re-branded and marketed disposable diapers that allowed us to stay in our throw away rut and that were also nutritious (for worms, that is). Well, it’s been done and gDiapers is doing it right. Disposable diapers that disappear as compost (residential or commercial). Certified as cradle to cradle, they go back to where they came from, closing the loop. Think of this as an aiki-solution. No fight, no flight, re-direction of disastrous behavior into virtuous, value-generating action. Same babies, same parents, same behaviors, different diapers, good waste.

Of all the things, more good from wasteful behavior. Chevy Chase: Ahahahaha … I like it!

Tags: aiki, and now for something completely different, Chevy Chase, compost, Cradle to cradle, disposable diapers, gdiapers, John Cleese, Tom Waits, you got to keep the devil way down in the hole

Special Announcement: The Green Marketplace Forum

For those of you in Japan or going to Japan at the end of September we are co-sponsoring this landmark event:

The American Chamber of Commerce in Japan Presents:

***********************************************************************

GREEN MARKETPLACE FORUM: THE FUTURE OF WORK, HOME, & HOW WE GET AROUND

Wednesday, September 30th, 9:00-18:30

DISTINGUISHED SPEAKER LIST INCLUDES:

• Mayor Hiroshi Nakada of Yokohama
• Paul Sands, General Manager of Virgin Airlines
• Kiyotaka Fujii, President of Better Place Japan
• U.S. Govt. Expert on emerging GOJ policy around carbon reduction targets and how that is shaping the business environment

PLUS:

Interactive “stakeholder dialogue” session: Your opportunity to connect and catalyze business opportunities with other individuals and organizations, and add your perspective to the discussion on emerging government policy around carbon reduction targets and how that is shaping the business environment

EVENT OVERVIEW:

The Green Marketplace Forum (GMF) is an interactive event that explores the future trends and business opportunities of Green Design/Building and Green Mobility/Transportation as they relate to our lifestyle and the many changes resulting from efforts to achieve a Carbon-free society. The US Embassy will also present an update on the Government of Japan’s carbon reduction targets and how this may affect the business environment and business opportunities. The GMF allows you to hear from and interact with policy-makers, thought leaders, organization leaders, innovators and entrepreneurs; and provides event participants with a process to begin moving from dialogue to action in these core areas of our lives and work.

DATE: Wednesday, September 30, 9:00 to 18:30

VENUE: Four Seasons at Chinzan-so in Tokyo

MAP: <http://www.fourseasons.com/tokyo/directions_and_map.html

<http://www.fourseasons.com/tokyo/directions_and_map.html> >

COST: (All fees include a buffet lunch)

Morning Session: Members: 7,000 yen; Guests: 8,000 yen

Afternoon Session: Members: 7,000 yen; Guests: 8,000 yen

Full Day: Members: 10,000 yen; Guests: 11,000 yen

Contact: Chad Stewart (chad@ikan.biz) to register

REGISTRATION AND CANCELLATION DEADLINE: 5 p.m., Friday, September 25

Tags: American Chamber of Commerce Japan, Better Place, carbon free, Green Building, Green Design, Green Mobility, Green Transportation, Hiroshi Nakada, Kiyotaka Fujii, Paul Sands, Virgin Airlines

Reflections On Being a Consumer

In a hotel in Osaka, was reading the Daily Yomiuri this morning. In an article about economic recovery the writer reported on the need for American consumers to start…consuming more. Japanese consumers seem to be doing their part. Americans are vexing the stock market, though, with their reticence to spend.

This inspired me to mangle William Carlos Williams:

So much depends on the American consumer / glazed with pain / inside the big box store.

In a recent conversation I was told that indigenous people in South America see consumers caught in a trance of consumption. Like the no-face character in Hayao Miyazaki’s Sen to Chichiro no Kamikakushi (Spirited Away) consumers seem to be insatiable in their appetite for more-or, at least, we are expected to be.

To be what? The engine and fuel of the global economy that’s what. The global economy needs us to buy more, spend more to support so that it can support us. Talk about dysfunctional co-dependence. Not healthy, not sustainable, not particularly attractive. Unless, you like another Miyazaki image from Spirited Away of Chihiro’s gluttonous parent’s changing into swollen, slobbering pigs as they gorge themselves at a counter heaping with food.

Yet, what is the alternative? If we stop buying all this stuff what are Wal-Mart and their myriad of suppliers going to do? You may think I’m being sarcastic-I’m not. So much does depend on our participation in this game of consumption.

Where to begin?

Be aware of the game you’re playing and the effects it is having on you, your family and the world around you. Next, learn the rules. As you’re putting that into practice let’s come together, convene. It’s time to change the rules.

Let’s stop being consumers of stuff and design a game that allows us to become creators of community, builders of value. Let’s build and design for abundance and not the scarcity and separation that comes with our current addiction to consumption.

You bring the bat. I’ve got the ball.

Tags: Daily Yomiuri, Hayao Miyazaki, Osaka, Sen to Chihiro no Kamikakushi, Spirited Away, Wal-Mart, William Carlos Williams

So, How Sustainable is the Wal-Mart Sustainability Index?

To quote Eric Clapton: “It’s in the way that you use it.”

The Wal-Mart sustainability index is measuring whether suppliers are measuring their impact on energy usage, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, resource depletion and the communities in which they operate. Essentially it’s binary with annotation. Are you or aren’t you? If you are, please describe what you are doing.

Wal-Mart is gathering data. The key question is “What for?” Wal-Mart has sustainability targets and standards. They can be found here. They are doing good work. Of particular note are their Sustainability Value Networks. In these networks they’re bringing together “leaders from our company, supplier companies, academia, government, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs)” to work in categories that are core to Wal-Mart’s business. It is a matter of course that they will compare what they are learning from their suppliers with their own progress, most likely incorporating best practices along the way.

So, how will they use it with the suppliers? In the answer to this question lies the answer to the question in the title of this post. And, to really uncover the meaning in that answer requires us to look at the quality of relationships Wal-Mart forms with the suppliers and the quality of relationships the suppliers form with their network.

What do I mean? First, sustainability is something we do together. Fundamentally local and place based, sustainability depends on the quality of our relationships with the world around us. Reducing impact is good, however, relationship-wise this creates a less bad quality of connection. Imagine a spouse telling you that to strengthen your relationship he/she was still going to be bad but, from now on, less bad than before. A start? Yes. A strong foundation for a long-term relationship? No.

Second, sustainability is long term. What are we trying to sustain? Us. How do we do that? By sustaining what sustains us. One way to conceptualize this is a Value Web. Incremental reduction, though currently necessary is not sufficient. We become the slowly-boiled frog. The quality of relationships in our value web slowly erode, the web disintegrates and less bad leads to very, very bad. Simply, we need more good.

So, back to Wal-Mart and their suppliers. Moving forward, the better they are able to build networks of Collaboration that strengthen and enhance the Value Web the more sustainable the Wal-Mart sustainability index becomes. This is where those Sustainability Value Networks could really become value-abling. And, the more coherent their approach, the more effective the networks become at being sustainable. Again, it’s in the way that they use it.

So, now, think about this: For a retail giant like Wal-Mart this is a big hairy audacious undertaking that will touch pretty much all of us for generations to come. This matters. So do we.

So much depends on how we are, what we see and what we do now. As we do as we do we get what we get, becoming what we become. These are interesting times…

Tags: best practices, Coherence, collaboration, Eric Clapton, greenhouse gas emissions, NGO's, Sustainability Index, Sustainability Value Networks, value web, Wal-Mart, waste reduction

The Wal-Mart Sustainability Index: An Overview

Retail giant, Wal-Mart, debuted their Sustainability Index in July. You can download Version 1.0 of the Index here. The latest list of questions on the survey is here.

The survey is divided into four categories: Energy and Climate, Material Efficiency, Natural Resources, People and Community. In essence, it will function as an baseline measurement tool that sorts suppliers by having them demonstrate they are in control of their energy (GHG), waste (solid/water) management and reduction initiatives, material sourcing (production/certification), and community engagement (awareness of impact). At best, it points toward Cooperation. Basically, though, it sets a bar of Compliance for companies that want to do business with Wal-Mart

Though the first category is titled “Energy and Climate” a more appropriate heading would be “Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” The four questions in the category are focused completely through the lens of reporting and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The second category, “Material Efficiency”, is dedicated to reduction of solid waste and water use. Linked closely to Wal-Mart’s Packaging Scorecard and their Zero-Waste initiative, it is asking companies to demonstrate how they “reduce waste and enhance quality.”

Category three, “Natural Resources” focuses mainly on sourcing and certification, asking companies to report on origin of materials, purchasing guidelines and 3rd-party certification.

The fourth category is “People and Community” and centers on corporate awareness of and engagement with the communities in which they operate. The first question is telling. It asks if companies know where all of their production and manufacturing facilities are. It’s a start…

Relatively unexceptional in its content it still has very strong potential to be a game-changing move. The reason is simple: as a supplier, to do business with Wal-Mart means doing business their way. Though they are not setting any baseline requirements at the moment, nor are they auditing suppliers (answers to the 15-question survey are received in good faith) they are asking suppliers to complete the survey. To do so means you want (and really need) to have policies and controls in place or risk getting pushed out by companies that do.

Ultimately, this points to the development of an embedded system of and processes for sustainable business. The question suppliers for Wal-Mart have to answer is: “How far do we want to go?” Simple Compliance or Conformity? Cooperation? Collaboration and Coherence? Or, systemic Constellation?

Up next: How sustainable is the Wal-Mart Sustainability Index?

Tags: Climate, Coherence, collaboration, Community, Compliance, Conformity, Constellation, cooperation, Energy, GHG, greenhouse gases, Material Efficiency, Natural Resources, Packaging Scorecard, Sustainability Index, Wal-Mart, waste, zero waste