<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Inconvenient Truth in Tokyo: Al Gore&#8217;s Appearance at Waseda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/</link>
	<description>Doing Well is Being Well</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Foulkes</title>
		<link>http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Foulkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ikan.biz/blog/?p=96#comment-818</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fuel Cells: The energy of the future and always will be!&quot;


This is a commonly quoted phrase repeated by those who understand the fuel cell industry. The recent efforts of other alternative energy sectors may be experiencing the same kind growing awareness as they begin to feel the pressure of market performance. 

Economic drivers, full life cycle analysis, blended technologies, location-specific applications, infrastructure... and the science (not magic!) that lies behind these technologies are often too complicated for the average educated person to truly grasp. 

Marketers and those seeking funding for the latest start-up are often dream-weaving, yet passionate and well-intentioned individuals. The key is to allocate resources with real economic potential. ROI is still the primary measure of human/organizational activity, and we dismiss it at our peril. 

Yet, there are encouraging developments. We do however, need to balance the implications of an energy paradigm shift with the way in which we measure progress: ROI. This is where governments have the opportunity to play an important role. Sound and transparent standards need to be established and met, so that viable research can be funded towards fruition. More pilot projects need to be seeded as responsible governments continue the role of Loss Leader. Of course, a nation&#039;s people need to get behind this kind of thing to, since most politicians do what they do for their own careers.

Enter Obama.

His brand of leadership promises to be interesting. We shall see, as the story unfolds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fuel Cells: The energy of the future and always will be!&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a commonly quoted phrase repeated by those who understand the fuel cell industry. The recent efforts of other alternative energy sectors may be experiencing the same kind growing awareness as they begin to feel the pressure of market performance. </p>
<p>Economic drivers, full life cycle analysis, blended technologies, location-specific applications, infrastructure&#8230; and the science (not magic!) that lies behind these technologies are often too complicated for the average educated person to truly grasp. </p>
<p>Marketers and those seeking funding for the latest start-up are often dream-weaving, yet passionate and well-intentioned individuals. The key is to allocate resources with real economic potential. ROI is still the primary measure of human/organizational activity, and we dismiss it at our peril. </p>
<p>Yet, there are encouraging developments. We do however, need to balance the implications of an energy paradigm shift with the way in which we measure progress: ROI. This is where governments have the opportunity to play an important role. Sound and transparent standards need to be established and met, so that viable research can be funded towards fruition. More pilot projects need to be seeded as responsible governments continue the role of Loss Leader. Of course, a nation&#8217;s people need to get behind this kind of thing to, since most politicians do what they do for their own careers.</p>
<p>Enter Obama.</p>
<p>His brand of leadership promises to be interesting. We shall see, as the story unfolds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 03:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ikan.biz/blog/?p=96#comment-675</guid>
		<description>I am watching “An Inconvenient Truth” for the 1st time. I have an environmental professor who contests the “science” Gore presents in the film, so I wanted to see for myself. I wanted to see the scientific info about global warming, which Gore does deliver on (even if one cannot be certain whether he is actually scientifically correct), but then he also mixes in all the political stuff. Why?? It makes him sound like an inconvenient sore loser - Gore lost; he should get over it already. Making this film political really takes away from Gore’s purported goal of focusing the public on the global warming problem. Gore’s lecture comes off more like a self-serving diatribe by a holier-than-thou preacher. This is actually ironic, considering that Gore lives in a 16,000 sq ft house - how much energy does it take to heat that mansion??? I am very disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am watching “An Inconvenient Truth” for the 1st time. I have an environmental professor who contests the “science” Gore presents in the film, so I wanted to see for myself. I wanted to see the scientific info about global warming, which Gore does deliver on (even if one cannot be certain whether he is actually scientifically correct), but then he also mixes in all the political stuff. Why?? It makes him sound like an inconvenient sore loser &#8211; Gore lost; he should get over it already. Making this film political really takes away from Gore’s purported goal of focusing the public on the global warming problem. Gore’s lecture comes off more like a self-serving diatribe by a holier-than-thou preacher. This is actually ironic, considering that Gore lives in a 16,000 sq ft house &#8211; how much energy does it take to heat that mansion??? I am very disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Smith</title>
		<link>http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ikan.biz/blog/?p=96#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Thanks Alexander. The link you&#039;ve attached makes some very important points. Time to pull together data  from the pro-wind turbine side for comparison. I&#039;ll see what I can do. This is exactly the kind of debate we need.
Very interesting and thought provoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alexander. The link you&#8217;ve attached makes some very important points. Time to pull together data  from the pro-wind turbine side for comparison. I&#8217;ll see what I can do. This is exactly the kind of debate we need.<br />
Very interesting and thought provoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ikan.biz/blog/?p=96#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Wind power is not a solution.
The whole truth about wind turbines is never told by lobbyists and governments.
How could the very weak and extremely unreliable initial energy source of a wind turbine ever produce a steady power of any significance, despite the fact that modern wind turbines are really sophisticated machines? 
Please think!   	
 And read:  “Wind energy- the whole truth” at: http://www.windenergy-the-truth.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind power is not a solution.<br />
The whole truth about wind turbines is never told by lobbyists and governments.<br />
How could the very weak and extremely unreliable initial energy source of a wind turbine ever produce a steady power of any significance, despite the fact that modern wind turbines are really sophisticated machines?<br />
Please think!<br />
 And read:  “Wind energy- the whole truth” at: <a href="http://www.windenergy-the-truth.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.windenergy-the-truth.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Smith</title>
		<link>http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ikan.biz/blog/?p=96#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Hey Ken,

Definitely a matter of profitability. If we look at current mainstream power delivery systems (like internal combustion engines) we see startling inefficiencies, which when added to the actual costs for extracting, transporting and refining oil describe a system that is heavily in the red in terms of generating ROI.

Regarding waiting, I&#039;m with you on the banks. Getting them to actually perform one of their key societal functions again would be nice, wouldn&#039;t it! 

Still there are a lot of us out there who still keep doing, buying and living as we always have, waiting for things to change or get &quot;better&quot;. We&#039;ve got to find a way to get everyone on the metaphorical bus if we&#039;re going to make the changes that need to be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ken,</p>
<p>Definitely a matter of profitability. If we look at current mainstream power delivery systems (like internal combustion engines) we see startling inefficiencies, which when added to the actual costs for extracting, transporting and refining oil describe a system that is heavily in the red in terms of generating ROI.</p>
<p>Regarding waiting, I&#8217;m with you on the banks. Getting them to actually perform one of their key societal functions again would be nice, wouldn&#8217;t it! </p>
<p>Still there are a lot of us out there who still keep doing, buying and living as we always have, waiting for things to change or get &#8220;better&#8221;. We&#8217;ve got to find a way to get everyone on the metaphorical bus if we&#8217;re going to make the changes that need to be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://ikan.biz/blog/2008/11/23/an-inconvenient-truth-in-tokyo-al-gores-appearance-at-waseda/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ikan.biz/blog/?p=96#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I wish I could have made it to see Gore speak, but couldn&#039;t get the time last week. Anyway, I&#039;ll take a stab:

&lt;em&gt;It isn’t a matter of technology now, the technology exists or is quickly coming on line. It is a matter of belief, hope, imagination, compassion, and will and courage. &lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s also a matter of profitability.

Most &quot;alternative&quot; energies are still incredibly inefficient. Look at what happened to Denmark, where wind power has been heavily subsidized. It&#039;s actually generating a negative ROI, which is a waste of taxpayer money (I&#039;m inclined to believe that just about all uses of tax funds are a waste of taxpayer  money, but hey). The technology to produce efficient alternative energies still isn&#039;t good enough, though that has to change. 

&lt;em&gt;I’ve asked this before and will keep asking anyone who will listen, what are you waiting for?&lt;/em&gt;

What are we waiting for? Well, it would be nice if the banks would start lending again. Private funding is going to develop better solutions than government subsidies - it always has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could have made it to see Gore speak, but couldn&#8217;t get the time last week. Anyway, I&#8217;ll take a stab:</p>
<p><em>It isn’t a matter of technology now, the technology exists or is quickly coming on line. It is a matter of belief, hope, imagination, compassion, and will and courage. </em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a matter of profitability.</p>
<p>Most &#8220;alternative&#8221; energies are still incredibly inefficient. Look at what happened to Denmark, where wind power has been heavily subsidized. It&#8217;s actually generating a negative ROI, which is a waste of taxpayer money (I&#8217;m inclined to believe that just about all uses of tax funds are a waste of taxpayer  money, but hey). The technology to produce efficient alternative energies still isn&#8217;t good enough, though that has to change. </p>
<p><em>I’ve asked this before and will keep asking anyone who will listen, what are you waiting for?</em></p>
<p>What are we waiting for? Well, it would be nice if the banks would start lending again. Private funding is going to develop better solutions than government subsidies &#8211; it always has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

